Sunday, August 14, 2005
A conversation I had with WT led me to wonder how traceable this blog really is. Hey, it's a valid concern. Just read this article, on how blogs can be used against job applicants:
Bloggers Need Not Apply. Ditto for future employers of the variety I am more personally familiar with.
A few searches on technorati.com turned up nothing of consequence. I'm not linked to many people so that minimises exposure. I have, essentially, 3 separate aliases, from the official to the casual to the weird pseudonym. The only relevant hit my birth cert name (sshhh... no blabbing it here :) Googles up is a (very ugly) shot of me in an IBO training session. The more commonly known alias is also, fortunately, too common to be much use. The exotic soubriquet is the most reliable handle on my online identity (the one-and-only on Google, the last time I checked), but is fortunately obscure, and should be getting more so now that I've got a new Gmail address.
There are
always ways and means, of course, and this thing
is still a public blog (and I intend to keep it that way), albeit not a search-friendly one. So, if you've gotten this far, you're probably all right. If not, do be assured that this blogger is one paranoid, mostly inoffensive individual with a healthy sense of self-preservation and a total lack of revolutionary fervour.
...at least, none that she will own up to. Hah.
Online paranoia extends to passwords, of course. No password is ever the same, practically none are dictionary words in any language whatsoever, and they can change on a whim. I love thinking up new passwords that are completely foreign yet deeply personal on the level that no one other than myself can fathom.
I shall stop before a prospective employer comes across this and decides that my seeming infatuation with secrecy suggests a duplicitous personality. Or something.
words were spilled on Sunday, August 14, 2005